Snowflake environments
Each environment was configured by hand, so differences between them cause bugs and make testing less meaningful.
Cloud & DevOps · Infrastructure Automation
We describe your infrastructure in code, bring what already exists under control, and set up a workflow where every change is planned, reviewed and recorded before it is applied.
Infrastructure as code services turn servers, networks, databases, DNS records and their configuration into version-controlled files that tools apply automatically. Provisioning tools such as Terraform or OpenTofu create and change cloud resources; configuration tools such as Ansible set up what runs on servers. Because the definitions live in Git, infrastructure can be reviewed like application code, recreated in a new environment and audited after the fact.
Infrastructure built by clicking through cloud consoles is hard to reproduce and hard to trust. Staging differs from production in ways nobody can list, a firewall rule added during an incident stays forever, and rebuilding an environment after a failure means reconstructing it from memory. Automation fixes this only if it is maintained: half-adopted Terraform with drifted state can be worse than none.
Each environment was configured by hand, so differences between them cause bugs and make testing less meaningful.
Nobody knows who opened a port, resized a database or changed a DNS record, or why.
Manual console changes alongside automation leave the code out of step with reality, and the next apply makes unexpected changes.
Recreating an environment for disaster recovery, a new region or a new client takes days of manual work.
Reusable modules for networks, compute, databases, storage, DNS and access, structured per environment and documented with their inputs and outputs.
Resources already running in your accounts brought under code without recreating them, then verified with a plan that shows no unintended changes.
Playbooks and roles to configure servers consistently: packages, users, hardening, web servers, databases and application runtimes.
Remote, locked and encrypted state storage, with secrets kept in a secrets manager or vault and referenced rather than written into code.
A pipeline that runs plans on pull requests, posts the proposed changes for review and applies them only after approval.
An audit of existing Terraform or Ansible code for structure, drift, security misconfigurations and upgrade issues, with fixes prioritized.
New environments come from code, not from memory or screenshots.
Every change is visible in a pull request with its planned effect before it happens.
Git history shows who changed what, when and with whose approval.
Rebuilding infrastructure becomes a matter of running known code against a fresh account or region.
Both environments generated from the same modules with different sizes, so tests on staging mean something.
An environment that can be recreated in another region or provider from code, combined with data restores.
Software vendors who deploy a dedicated environment per customer, repeatably, from the same definitions.
Many servers kept on the same packages, users and hardening baseline with Ansible instead of individual SSH sessions.
Existing resources are imported and verified before anything is changed.
List the resources in each account and environment, and note which were created by hand.
Agree repository layout, module boundaries, naming, tagging and how environments are separated.
Write modules and import existing resources, checking each with a clean plan.
Add Ansible roles for what runs on the machines, applied to one server first, then the rest.
Run plans on pull requests and apply after approval, with state locked and secrets stored safely.
Reduce console write access so changes go through code, and schedule drift checks.
Document modules and the change workflow, and train the team that will maintain them.
| Criterion | Terraform / OpenTofu | Ansible |
|---|---|---|
| Main job | Create and change cloud resources | Configure software on servers |
| Style | Declarative, with tracked state | Procedural tasks, designed to be idempotent |
| Typical targets | Networks, VMs, databases, DNS, IAM | Packages, users, services, config files |
| State | State file stored remotely | No central state; inspects hosts each run |
| Often used | Together: Terraform/OpenTofu builds the servers, Ansible configures them | Together: as above, or alone for existing fleets |
Credentials referenced from a secrets manager; state encrypted and access-restricted because it can contain sensitive values.
Static checks flag public buckets, open security groups and unencrypted storage before they are applied.
The pipeline's cloud identity is limited to what it manages, using short-lived credentials where possible.
Adding capacity or environments uses the same tested modules, avoiding one-off configurations.
We bring existing hand-built infrastructure under code carefully, rather than requiring a rebuild.
Modules are kept simple enough that your team can review and maintain them.
We work with Terraform or OpenTofu and with Ansible, and recommend based on your needs and licensing preferences.
Infrastructure code fits into the same CI/CD and review practices as your application code.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
Infrastructure as code is the practice of defining servers, networks, databases and other infrastructure in version-controlled files that tools apply automatically. It replaces manual console changes with reviewed, repeatable changes.
Both use the same configuration language and most providers and modules work with either. OpenTofu is an open-source fork maintained under the Linux Foundation, created after Terraform's license changed; Terraform is developed by HashiCorp, now part of IBM. The choice usually comes down to licensing preference and whether you use HashiCorp's commercial tooling.
Yes. Existing resources can be imported into Terraform or OpenTofu without being recreated. We write the matching code, import each resource and confirm the plan shows no unintended changes before anything is applied.
Not always. Terraform or OpenTofu handles cloud resources; Ansible handles configuration inside servers. If you run mainly managed services or containers, Terraform alone is often enough; if you manage many VPS servers, Ansible may be the bigger win.
The code and reality drift apart, and the next plan will show the difference. We run regular drift checks and reduce console write access so that changes go through code, and we either import or revert manual changes when they appear.
Next step
Tell us which providers and environments you run. We'll suggest a module structure and the order in which to bring resources under code.