Too much access for too many identities
Administrator permissions given by default to people, CI systems and applications, plus long-lived keys nobody rotates.
Cloud & DevOps · Security
Most cloud incidents start with something ordinary: an over-privileged key, a public bucket, an unpatched server. We find those first, fix them, and set up the routines that help keep them fixed.
Cloud security services review and strengthen how a cloud environment controls access, protects data and detects problems. The work typically covers identity and access management, secrets handling, network exposure, encryption, logging, backups and vulnerability management across accounts on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure or VPS providers. It is practical engineering to reduce risk; it is not by itself a compliance certification or audit attestation.
Cloud providers secure the underlying infrastructure, but the configuration of your accounts is your responsibility. In fast-moving teams that configuration accumulates risk quietly: every developer has administrator rights, access keys created years ago still work, a storage bucket was made public for a quick test, and logs are either missing or never read. None of this shows up until someone else finds it.
Administrator permissions given by default to people, CI systems and applications, plus long-lived keys nobody rotates.
Passwords and API keys in source code, environment files, chat messages and wiki pages.
Databases, admin panels or storage buckets reachable from the internet because of a permissive rule or default.
Audit logging disabled or kept too briefly, so a suspicious change or access cannot be investigated.
A structured review of accounts, identities, network rules, storage, encryption, logging and patching, with findings ranked by risk and effort to fix.
Roles designed per job function, multi-factor authentication enforced, root or owner accounts locked away, and old users and keys removed.
Credentials moved into a secrets manager or vault, removed from code and history where possible, and rotated after the move.
Public, application and data tiers separated, security groups and firewalls narrowed, and administrative access routed through VPN, bastion or identity-aware access.
Audit trails, access logs and provider security findings enabled, retained and routed to alerts for high-risk events.
Patching routines for servers and images, dependency and container scanning, and backups protected from deletion with tested restores.
Fewer public endpoints, fewer privileged identities and fewer secrets lying around.
Findings ranked by risk mean limited time goes to what matters most.
With logging in place, suspicious activity can be traced instead of guessed at.
Documented controls make security questionnaires and due diligence easier to answer truthfully.
A cloud account that began with one shared admin login and now has many people, services and environments.
A software vendor that needs to answer enterprise customers' security questions accurately and close obvious gaps first.
An organization that needs to find and remove access held by former employees or contractors.
Healthcare, finance or HR applications where customer or patient data needs stronger access control, encryption and logging.
The most dangerous findings are fixed before broader hardening begins.
Agree which accounts, environments and applications are in scope, and what access we need to review them read-only.
Assess identities, network exposure, data protection, logging, patching and backups against established good practice.
A prioritized list of findings in plain language, with the risk each poses and how to fix it.
Close the most dangerous gaps first, such as public data, unused admin keys and missing MFA.
Implement least-privilege roles, secrets management, segmentation and logging, ideally through infrastructure as code.
Set up scanning, access reviews and restore tests on a schedule so the improvements hold.
Assessments use read-only roles where possible, and our own access follows the same least-privilege rules we recommend.
Hardening is applied through infrastructure as code where possible, so it is reviewable and less likely to drift back.
Backup storage with versioning or immutability so ransomware or a compromised account can't easily erase recovery points.
Role templates and policies applied to new accounts and environments as they are created.
We fix issues as well as report them, with engineers who build and run cloud environments day to day.
We are clear that a security review is not a penetration test or a certification audit, and we recommend specialists when you need those.
Recommendations are ordered so a small team can make real progress without stopping product work.
As software developers, we can also fix the code-level issues, such as hard-coded secrets, behind many cloud findings.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
A cloud security review covers identity and access, secrets, network exposure, encryption, logging, patching and backups across your cloud accounts. The result is a prioritized list of findings with the risk each poses and the recommended fix.
No. Our cloud security service is a configuration review and hardening engagement, not a penetration test, a certification or a compliance attestation. It can help you prepare for those, and we will recommend specialist providers when you need a formal test or audit.
Least privilege means every person, service and pipeline has only the permissions its job requires, and nothing more. In practice that means role-based access, no everyday use of root or owner accounts, short-lived credentials where possible and regular reviews to remove unused access.
Rotate the exposed credentials first, because removing them from code does not undo the exposure. Then move them into a secrets manager, clean them from history where practical and add secret scanning to prevent a repeat.
We review environments on AWS, Google Cloud and Azure, as well as servers on providers such as DigitalOcean, Hetzner and Hostinger VPS. The principles are the same; the specific services and settings differ.
Review access and exposure regularly, and always after significant changes such as new environments, staff departures or a new vendor. Automated scanning and alerting cover the gaps between reviews.
Next step
Tell us which providers and accounts you run. We'll outline a review scope and the read-only access we'd need to start.