A bill nobody can explain
Idle instances, oversized databases, forgotten snapshots and data-transfer charges add up when there is no cost model or tagging to attribute spend to a project.
Cloud & DevOps · Architecture
We design the environment your applications will live in, and write down why each choice was made, so building, migrating and operating it later is predictable.
Cloud architecture services are the work of designing how an organization's applications, data and networks should run on cloud infrastructure: which provider and services to use, how environments are separated, how traffic flows, how identity is controlled and what it will cost to run. The output is a target architecture with diagrams and written decisions, not a running system. A sound design makes the later build, migration and operations work far less likely to need rework.
Many cloud environments are never designed. They accumulate. A developer launches a server, someone adds a managed database, a second project copies the first account's settings, and within a couple of years nobody can explain the network, the monthly bill or who has administrator access. Redesigning a live environment is far harder than designing a new one, which is why the architecture deserves attention before the first workload goes in.
Idle instances, oversized databases, forgotten snapshots and data-transfer charges add up when there is no cost model or tagging to attribute spend to a project.
One server, one availability zone or one database without replicas means a routine hardware fault becomes a business outage.
Production, staging and experiments sharing one account and one network make it easy for a test change or a leaked key to affect live systems.
Provider, region, database engine and compute model are often picked by whoever set things up first, not by matching them to the workload, data residency or team skills.
An inventory of what runs today (servers, databases, storage, DNS, third-party services and access) with the risks and cost drivers we find, written in plain language.
Diagrams and a written design covering compute, data stores, networking, identity, environments and how each application component maps onto them.
A reasoned recommendation between AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, Hetzner or a VPS host such as Hostinger, and between managed services and self-managed ones, based on your workload and team.
Availability targets agreed with you, then the zones, replicas, backups and recovery procedures needed to meet them, including the recovery point and time each option realistically gives.
An estimate of monthly running cost by component, a tagging scheme, budgets and alerts, and the reserved-capacity or savings-plan decisions worth considering.
For an existing environment, a structured review across operational excellence, security, reliability, performance, cost and sustainability, with findings ranked by impact and effort.
You know roughly what the environment will cost each month and which components drive that figure.
Failure modes are considered on paper, where fixing them is cheap, instead of during an outage.
Builds, migrations and automation follow an agreed design instead of re-debating every decision.
Written decisions mean the reasoning survives staff changes and vendor changes.
A founder needs an architecture that is cheap at launch but does not have to be thrown away once paying customers arrive.
A company moving from on-premises servers or a shared host wants the destination designed before any data is moved.
A new CTO takes over a cloud account built by several contractors and needs to know what is there, what it costs and what is risky.
An Odoo or custom ERP deployment has outgrown a single server and needs a design for database, workers, storage and backups.
Every recommendation traces back to a requirement you agreed to.
Interviews about the applications, users, growth expectations, compliance needs and the budget the design must fit.
Review of the existing environment or, for new builds, the application's components and dependencies.
Availability, recovery, performance, data residency and cost targets agreed in writing, because every design trade-off depends on them.
Usually two or three candidate architectures with their cost, complexity and risk compared side by side.
One option chosen with you, and every significant decision recorded with its reasoning.
Diagrams, the written design, a cost estimate and an implementation plan broken into phases.
A walkthrough with your engineers, then the design is built by your team, by us, or jointly.
| Criterion | Single VPS | Managed cloud services | Container platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical providers | Hetzner, DigitalOcean, Hostinger VPS | AWS, Google Cloud, Azure | Managed Kubernetes on any major provider |
| Operational effort | Low to moderate | Moderate; provider runs the services | Higher; needs platform skills |
| Resilience | Limited to one machine unless designed otherwise | Multi-zone options built in | High, if configured correctly |
| Cost profile | Low and predictable | Usage-based; needs monitoring | Cluster overhead plus workloads |
| Best fit | Small apps, internal tools, early products | Growing products, managed databases, variable load | Many services, frequent deploys, platform team |
Administrator access, service accounts and role boundaries are designed up front, not bolted on after an incident.
Public, private and data tiers separated so databases are never directly reachable from the internet.
Encryption in transit and at rest specified for every data store and every connection between components.
Backups kept separate from the systems they protect, with restore testing written into the operating plan.
We recommend the provider that fits the workload (sometimes a hyperscaler, sometimes a well-run VPS), not the one we prefer to work with.
The same team builds and runs infrastructure, so designs account for patching, monitoring and day-to-day operations.
We also write software, so the architecture reflects how your application actually behaves rather than generic reference diagrams.
Each option comes with its cost, complexity and risk explained so non-specialist decision makers can choose.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
It delivers a written target architecture: diagrams, the decisions behind them, a monthly cost estimate and a phased implementation plan. It does not by itself build anything. The design can then be implemented by your team, by Digihub, or by both together.
The right provider depends on your workload, data residency, existing skills and budget rather than on which provider is largest. AWS, Google Cloud and Azure offer the widest managed-service range; DigitalOcean, Hetzner and VPS hosts are simpler and often cheaper for steady workloads. We compare the realistic options for your case before recommending one.
Yes, a well-architected review of an existing environment is one of the most common requests. We assess security, reliability, performance, operations and cost, then give you a prioritized list of findings with the effort each fix involves.
We price each component of the design using the provider's published pricing and your expected usage, then show which items dominate the total. Usage-based billing means the real bill will vary, so the design also includes budgets, alerts and tagging to track spend once live.
Most small and mid-sized businesses do not need multi-cloud, because it adds complexity, cost and skills requirements. It can make sense for specific reasons such as regulatory constraints or a dependency on one provider's unique service. We usually recommend designing for portability instead: containers, infrastructure as code and standard databases.
You choose. Some clients take the design to their in-house team; others ask Digihub to build it using infrastructure as code, migrate workloads and then manage the environment.
Next step
Tell us what you run today and where you want to be. We'll come back with the questions that shape the design and a proposal for the architecture work.