Editors lose preview
Without a preview integration, editors publish blind and check the live site afterwards.
Website Development · Headless CMS
We separate your content from your presentation: editors work in a headless CMS, and a fast Next.js site renders that content, with previews and publishing that still feel immediate.
Headless CMS development services are the design and build of websites where content is managed in a CMS that has no front end of its own, and delivered through an API to a separately built front end such as a Next.js application. The CMS handles content modelling, editing and workflows; the front end handles design, routing and performance. The same content can also feed apps, kiosks or other sites, at the cost of running and maintaining two systems.
Teams move to headless for speed, design freedom or multi-channel content, then discover new problems: editors can't preview pages, published changes take a rebuild to appear, and nobody planned how the CMS and front end are deployed and kept in sync. Headless works well when these are designed in from the start rather than solved after launch.
Without a preview integration, editors publish blind and check the live site afterwards.
Statically built pages don't update until the next build unless revalidation is wired to CMS events.
Copying a page-based structure into a headless CMS loses the main advantage: reusable, structured content.
Hosting, deployments, access and monitoring now apply to both the CMS and the front end.
Choosing a headless CMS (hosted or self-hosted, such as Sanity, Strapi, Payload, Contentful or headless WordPress) based on editors, content model, hosting and budget.
Content types, references and reusable sections designed for the website now and other channels later.
A Next.js application with static generation, server rendering or incremental revalidation chosen per route, and a component library mapped to CMS blocks.
Draft previews of unpublished content and on-demand revalidation triggered by CMS webhooks, so published changes appear promptly.
Metadata, structured data, sitemaps and redirects generated from CMS content, with images served through optimized pipelines.
CI/CD for the front end, hosting for both systems, environment separation, monitoring and handover documentation.
Design and interactions aren't limited by a CMS's theme system.
Pre-rendered and cached pages served from the edge, with revalidation keeping them current.
Structured content can feed new channels without re-entering it.
The CMS and the front end can be upgraded or replaced separately.
Organizations that want pre-rendered pages and fine control over every script on the page.
Content reused across a website, a mobile app and partner sites from one CMS.
Keeping the familiar WordPress editor while replacing the theme with a Next.js front end.
Editorial content from a headless CMS combined with product data from Shopify or another commerce API.
Preview and revalidation are built mid-project, so editors test them long before launch.
Confirm headless is justified versus a traditional CMS for your goals and team.
Select the CMS, hosting and rendering approach, with costs written down.
Design content types and blocks, tested with real content examples.
Next.js components mapped one-to-one to CMS blocks.
Draft previews and webhook-based updates set up and tested by editors.
Existing content transformed into the structured model and imported.
Deployment, redirects, monitoring and documentation for both systems.
| Criterion | Traditional CMS | Headless CMS + Next.js |
|---|---|---|
| Front end | Theme inside the CMS | Separate Next.js application |
| Preview | Built in | Needs a preview integration |
| Content reuse across channels | Limited | Designed for it |
| Systems to maintain | One | Two |
| Best fit | Content sites with standard layouts | Custom design, strict performance or multiple channels |
The editing system can sit behind authentication, separate from the public site.
Read-only tokens for published content, separate preview tokens, all kept server-side.
Revalidation endpoints check a shared secret before acting on CMS events.
Static and cached pages absorb traffic spikes without loading the CMS.
Next.js is a core part of our front-end stack, including caching and revalidation patterns.
If a traditional CMS would serve you better, we'll recommend it and explain why.
Preview and publishing are built and tested with your editors, not left for later.
We handle the CMS, the front end, hosting and integrations such as Odoo or Shopify.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
A headless CMS is a content management system that stores and manages content but doesn't render web pages. It delivers content through an API to a separate front end, such as a Next.js website or a mobile app.
Headless is worth it when you need a custom front end, strict performance control, or the same content in several channels, and you have the budget to run two systems. For a content site with standard layouts and a small team, a traditional CMS is often simpler and cheaper.
Yes, when preview is built in. We set up draft previews so editors can see unpublished changes rendered by the real front end before publishing.
Yes. Headless WordPress keeps the WordPress editor and serves content through its REST API or a GraphQL plugin to a Next.js front end. Some plugins that rely on the theme layer won't work in a headless setup, so we review your plugins first.
It depends on your editors, hosting preferences and budget. Hosted platforms such as Sanity or Contentful reduce operations work, while open-source options such as Strapi or Payload can be self-hosted for more control. We compare them against your requirements before recommending one.
It can be very good for SEO when pages are pre-rendered or server-rendered, so search engines receive full HTML, and when metadata, sitemaps and redirects are managed from the CMS. A headless site rendered only in the browser would be weaker, which is why we use Next.js rendering.
Next step
Tell us about your content, editors and channels. We'll tell you if headless is worth it and which CMS and rendering approach we'd use.