Keyword search misses meaning
Searching "leave carry forward" won't find a policy that says "unused annual holiday" unless the words match.
AI & Automation · Search
We build search over your policies, manuals, contracts, tickets and records that understands what people mean, respects who is allowed to see what, and backs every generated answer with links to the passages it came from.
AI enterprise search is search across an organization's documents and systems that uses embeddings to match the meaning of a query rather than only its keywords, often combined with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to compose a direct answer from the retrieved passages. Each answer should cite the sources it used so readers can verify it. Search quality depends far more on how content is prepared, chunked, permissioned and kept current than on the language model that writes the answer.
Staff spend time hunting for the latest version of a policy, a clause in a contract or the fix for a recurring fault, because keyword search only finds exact words and knowledge is split across drives, wikis, email and the ERP. Simply pointing a chatbot at all of it creates new problems: outdated documents get quoted, confidential files leak to the wrong people, and answers arrive without any way to check them.
Searching "leave carry forward" won't find a policy that says "unused annual holiday" unless the words match.
Shared drives, wikis, PDFs, helpdesk tickets and ERP records each hold part of the answer.
A search index that doesn't respect source access rights can expose salary files or board papers to everyone.
Old versions sit beside current ones, and retrieval will happily use whichever matches best.
Identifying authoritative sources, removing or flagging outdated material, and building connectors that sync documents and records on a schedule.
Splitting documents into meaningful sections with titles and metadata, generating embeddings and storing them in a vector index alongside a keyword index.
Combining semantic and keyword search, with re-ranking and metadata filters such as department, document type or date.
A language model composes answers only from retrieved passages, cites each source and says when the content doesn't contain an answer.
Access rights from source systems carried into the index, so users only retrieve content they are allowed to open.
A test set of real questions with known source passages, used to measure retrieval and answer quality before and after every change.
People find relevant passages by meaning, even when they don't know the document's wording.
Citations let readers open the source and confirm the answer for themselves.
Search respects the same permissions as the original systems.
Questions that return nothing show where documentation is missing or unclear.
Employees ask about HR, finance or safety procedures and get a short answer with links to the exact section of the current policy.
Engineers and field staff search manuals, specifications and past fault reports by describing the problem in their own words.
Teams locate clauses across many contracts and see each match in context, with the review left to qualified staff.
Site search that finds the right help article from a customer's description, as the retrieval layer behind a chatbot or support tool.
Retrieval is measured and tuned before answer generation is switched on, because a model can only be as good as the passages it receives.
Collect real questions staff or customers ask, and identify where the correct answers live.
Decide which sources are authoritative, how they are permissioned and how often they change.
Connect sources, chunk and embed content, and set up hybrid retrieval with metadata.
Measure whether the right passages are found for each test question, and tune chunking and ranking.
Introduce cited answers once retrieval is reliable, and test for unsupported statements.
Release to one department, gather feedback on bad results and fill content gaps at the source.
Monitor sync jobs, feedback and test results as content and models change.
| Criterion | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) | Fine-tuning |
|---|---|---|
| How knowledge is added | Documents retrieved at question time | Model weights trained on examples |
| Keeping content current | Re-index changed documents | Retrain the model |
| Citations | Yes, from retrieved passages | Not inherently |
| Access control | Enforced at retrieval | Difficult once knowledge is in the model |
| Best for | Answering from changing documents | Teaching a consistent style or task format |
Document-level access is mirrored from source systems and checked at query time.
Index and models can run in your cloud account or on your servers if content must stay in-house.
Retrieved text is treated as data, with safeguards so instructions inside documents don't override system rules.
Searches and answers are logged under retention rules for audit and quality review.
We prove the system finds the right passages before adding a model that writes answers.
We build an evaluation set from your real questions, so improvements are demonstrated rather than claimed.
We can index ERP records and Odoo Documents alongside files, which most generic tools don't reach.
Access control is designed into the index from day one, not patched later.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) means the system first retrieves relevant passages from your content and then asks a language model to answer using only those passages. It keeps answers tied to your current documents and makes citations possible, which a model answering from its general training cannot do.
Yes. If retrieval returns the wrong passage or the model misreads it, the answer can be wrong, which is why we show citations, allow "not found" responses and evaluate with a test set of real questions. Users should check the cited source for anything consequential.
Not if permissions are designed correctly. We carry access rights from source systems into the index and filter results at query time, so a user retrieves only what they could already open.
For answering questions from documents that change, RAG is usually the better choice because it stays current, cites sources and enforces permissions. Fine-tuning is more useful for teaching a model a specific style or output format.
It depends on scale and your existing stack. For many business deployments, PostgreSQL with the pgvector extension is sufficient and keeps everything in one database; dedicated vector databases are considered when volume or features require them.
The main drivers are the number and complexity of sources to connect, content volume to index, permission requirements, query volume and the models used for embeddings and answers. We estimate after the source audit.
Next step
Share a dozen real questions and where you think the answers are stored. We'll check whether AI search can find them reliably and what needs cleaning up first.