Requests stuck in inboxes
Approvals depend on email and memory, so nobody can tell where a request is or who is holding it up.
Custom Software · Workflow Automation
We automate the approvals, notifications, hand-offs and data transfers that currently depend on someone remembering to forward an email, connecting the tools you already own rather than replacing them.
Workflow automation services design and build the rules that move a piece of work from one step to the next without manual chasing: when a form is submitted, a record changes or a deadline passes, the right person is notified, the right approval is requested and the right data is copied to the next system. It sits between your existing tools, using triggers, conditions and actions. The result is fewer stalled requests and a visible status for every item in flight.
Most delays in a business are not in the work itself but in the gaps between steps: a purchase request waiting in someone's inbox, a new customer not set up in the accounting system, a document approved but never filed. Each gap is small, but together they slow everything down and make status impossible to see. Automating the hand-offs closes those gaps without asking teams to abandon the tools they know.
Approvals depend on email and memory, so nobody can tell where a request is or who is holding it up.
Details entered in a form, CRM or spreadsheet are manually re-entered into the ERP, accounting or project tool.
Approval limits and routing depend on who handles the request that day, not on written policy.
Scripts and low-code flows built ad hoc fail silently, and nobody notices until a customer complains.
Documenting each process step, decision point, owner and system involved, and identifying the hand-offs worth automating first.
Multi-level approvals based on amount, department or category, with delegation, escalation on timeouts and reminders.
Flows that start from form submissions, record changes, incoming emails, webhooks or schedules, and act across connected systems.
Business rules kept in a readable, configurable layer so routing and thresholds can change without rewriting the flow.
An honest recommendation between low-code tools, your ERP's built-in automation and custom code, based on volume, complexity and cost of ownership.
Retries, alerts on failure, run logs and a dashboard showing every item's current step.
Requests move to the next step the moment the previous one finishes, without waiting for someone to notice.
Anyone can see where an item is and who it is waiting on.
Routing and approval limits follow written rules every time.
Teams continue working in the systems they know while the gaps between them are closed.
Requests routed by amount and department, approved from email or chat, then created automatically in the ERP.
A signed form creates records in CRM and accounting, requests documents, and assigns follow-up tasks.
New enquiries assigned to the right salesperson by region or product, with reminders if nobody responds.
Tasks for HR, IT and managers triggered on a start or leave date, with account creation and removal tracked.
We start with the hand-off that causes the most delay, prove it, then move to the next.
Walk through the process with its owners and draw each step, decision and system involved.
Rank hand-offs by delay, volume and error rate to choose what to automate first.
Low-code tool, ERP automation or custom service, decided per workflow with the trade-offs written down.
Implement triggers, rules and actions, with test data covering normal paths and exceptions.
Run the automation for one team or request type and adjust rules based on real cases.
Extend to all users, set up alerts and hand over a runbook for when something fails.
| Criterion | Low-code platform | ERP built-in automation | Custom code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed to first result | Fast | Fast if the ERP already holds the data | Slower |
| Complex logic | Limited | Moderate | Most flexible |
| Running cost | Per-task or per-user fees that grow with volume | Included in the ERP | Hosting and maintenance |
| Version control & testing | Limited | Moderate | Full |
| Best fit | Simple flows between SaaS tools | Processes centered on ERP records | High-volume, complex or business-critical flows |
Each integration uses its own service account with only the permissions the flow requires.
Who approved, rejected or changed what, and when, is recorded for every workflow item.
Failed steps retry and then alert a named owner, rather than silently dropping work.
High-volume flows use queues and rate limiting so external APIs are not overwhelmed.
We recommend low-code, ERP-native or custom automation per workflow based on cost of ownership, not on what we prefer to build.
Because we implement Odoo, we often find that a workflow can be automated inside the ERP without extra tools.
Every automation we deliver has logging, alerts and a named owner.
Steps such as classifying documents or drafting replies can later use AI, built by the same team.
Fixed-price packages with the scope written down, paid stage by stage. Your project goes live once it's fully paid.
Official documentation and guidance if you want to read more about this topic.
Low-code tools are a good fit for simple, low-volume flows between common SaaS applications. Custom code is better when logic is complex, volumes are high, per-task fees become expensive, or the workflow is critical enough to need version control and automated tests.
Often, yes. Odoo, for example, has automated actions, scheduled jobs and approval features that can handle many workflows centered on ERP records without an extra tool. We check that option first.
Failed steps are retried automatically and then reported to a named owner by alert. Run logs show exactly which item failed and why, so it can be fixed and resumed.
We build delegation and escalation rules: an approver can delegate for a period, and requests waiting beyond a set time escalate to the next person in the chain.
Cost depends on the number of workflows, the number of systems involved, the quality of their APIs, the complexity of rules and the platform chosen. Automating one well-defined workflow first is a low-risk way to start.
Next step
Describe one process that relies on chasing people by email. We'll map it and show you which steps can run themselves.